Description of work
The WP3 develops a theoretical framework for how media-hype phenomena in science and the public reception of science can be understood as avalanches in the information dissemination in coupled communication networks. Starting from this innovative theoretical approach the WP mainly focuses on mapping scientific avalanches in a mediated environment. Several case studies will be selected on the basis of our earlier, social scientific studies on recent public controversies over science (BSE crisis, foot-an-mouth disease, gm-foods and stem-cell therapies). Such controversies will be followed in more traditional media (such as scientific publications, journals like Nature and Science, newspapers and broadcasting). The data collection on topic diffusion and the involved actors will be complementary to web-based phenomena analyzed in WP4.
The workpackage has a theoretical and an empirical component. Theoretically, the project applies the concepts of complex network theory and social network analysis to the field of science communication. Traditionally studies in science communication tend to be qualitative, small case studies on specific scientific controversies. In contrast, WP3 applies quantitative methods to the analysis of communication networks in science, and provides a novel theoretical and methodological perspective in science studies. This is expected to provide data for the network analysis (WP5) and to inform policy-makers on how public trust in science develops across the various communication networks (WP6).
T3.1: Develop a theoretical framework in terms of a social science description of
information avalanches in mediated communication networks
T3.2: Identification of the real world case studies
T3.3: Data collection
T3.4: Preliminary analysis of the data for WP 4 and WP5
T3.5: Policy recommendations (WP6) |