| Lecture presented at the workshop "Complex Systems in Natural and Social Sciences" (CSNSS’99), 14-17 September 1999, Kazimierz Dolny, Poland | 
 Next: Bibliography
 Up: Scientific cycle model with
 Previous: Scientific cycle model with
We assume that changes in the time evolution of the system 
-- natural sciences -- at time t depend on both 
the state of the system at the current time, x(t), and 
on the state in a certain past time  .
The 
feedback
.
The 
feedback  between present changes and past 
states can be written as
between present changes and past 
states can be written as 
 is time delay. It is assumed the simplest version 
of the identity feedback. Then dynamical system (1) 
is called a delay differential equation (DDE).
is time delay. It is assumed the simplest version 
of the identity feedback. Then dynamical system (1) 
is called a delay differential equation (DDE). 
The system (1) constitutes the simplest model of 
growth of natural sciences in which the rate of creation of 
new results x(t) depends on the state of science (measured 
by a number of scientific results) in the past  .
.
In the real evolution there is many different ideas 
having influence on the growth of science after delay time. 
The delay  can be interpreted as a notion of time to build, 
connecting with time needed for deeper understanding of 
theory content. Here the delay parameter
can be interpreted as a notion of time to build, 
connecting with time needed for deeper understanding of 
theory content. Here the delay parameter  means the time needed for writing an essential paper, however 
this parameter may have different interpretations. 
Among physicists working on a given problem there is 
a common feeling whether obtained result is important and 
essential in the present status of science [1]. 
We assume that the speed of creation of new results in 
time t is proportional to a number of results in time t-T. 
We consider that increase of essential papers represents 
the growth of science. These papers are necessary to write 
a new essential paper because it builds up on older results. 
Increase of knowledge given by a number of essential papers 
in a unit of time is a function of a total number of papers 
in different past moments Ti with some coefficients
means the time needed for writing an essential paper, however 
this parameter may have different interpretations. 
Among physicists working on a given problem there is 
a common feeling whether obtained result is important and 
essential in the present status of science [1]. 
We assume that the speed of creation of new results in 
time t is proportional to a number of results in time t-T. 
We consider that increase of essential papers represents 
the growth of science. These papers are necessary to write 
a new essential paper because it builds up on older results. 
Increase of knowledge given by a number of essential papers 
in a unit of time is a function of a total number of papers 
in different past moments Ti with some coefficients  .
.
 
 .
Provided that all delay are 
the same Ti = T for all i then
.
Provided that all delay are 
the same Ti = T for all i then 
 
Our model is the simplest in which there is included only 
single constant delay parameter  .
This toy model we can 
explain observed periodicity in dynamics of growth sciences 
[1,4,6]. 
There is a good evidence of exponential growth of 
scientific results the initial developing of a new theory
[2,5].
.
This toy model we can 
explain observed periodicity in dynamics of growth sciences 
[1,4,6]. 
There is a good evidence of exponential growth of 
scientific results the initial developing of a new theory
[2,5]. 
Following the de Sola Price model -- science is a dynamical 
process with a positive feedback. New results in output are 
given in input i.e. 
This model can be enriched with both time delay and 
the Miller mechanism of dying of some results 
The delay in DDEs provides a natural method by which constant coefficient equations can be solved, even when these equations are nonlinear as in our example. However, this method requires tedious computations and often yields cumbersome solutions.
An analytically simpler method of describing solutions to DDEs ,
which is well known from the theory of ODE ,is the analysis of 
the characteristic equation. In our case it is the equation 
for linearized equation (3), i.e
After centering the fixed point at the origin (4) we 
obtain x-x*=y, the linear equation for the perturbation 
around a fixed point
|  | (5) | 
 and constants
and constants 
 .
Let us note that similar equation was obtained 
by Kalecki in his business cycle model [3].
.
Let us note that similar equation was obtained 
by Kalecki in his business cycle model [3].
We assume that there is  a solution 
 and 
the characteristic equation for system (4) has the form
and 
the characteristic equation for system (4) has the form
Our idea is to search for cyclic behaviour in the system (4). This behaviour is analogous to economic phenomenon known as business cycle. Therefore it can be described as scientific cycle.
The creation of cyclic behaviour is understood in terms of bifurcation theory. The Hopf bifurcation takes place if the pair of imaginary eigenvalues crossing transversally an imaginary axis on the Gauss plane. To prove this fact we can check that:
1) there is the pair of conjugated complex solution of (6)
in the form 
 and there is only one 
for which real part of eigenvalue
and there is only one 
for which real part of eigenvalue 
 ;
;
2) the transversality condition is fulfilled, i.e. 
 .
.
After the decomposition the equation (6) on real and 
imaginary part we obtain 
Because of a reflection symmetry of this equation 
 we can assume that
we can assume that  .
The cyclic behaviour can appear if
.
The cyclic behaviour can appear if  ,
and from 
(7-8)
,
and from 
(7-8)
 
 
This means that if 
 there always exist
there always exist  and consequently a periodic solution with the approximately 
constant period
and consequently a periodic solution with the approximately 
constant period
 
Now we must check the transversality condition
![\begin{eqnarray*}
{\rm Re} \frac{\partial \lambda}{\partial T} &=&
{\rm Re} \fr...
...- \lambda^2 - \lambda \beta] =
-(\sigma^2 - \omega^2) - \sigma
\end{eqnarray*}](img35.png) 
 
 
 
 
 
