Ultrametricity in Hedge fund Selection and Fund of Funds
Diversification
Gabriele Susinno and Augusta Miceli
Abstract:
Minimum market transparency requirements impose hedge fund (HF) managers to use
the statement declared strategy in practice. However each declared strategy may
actually origin a multiplicity of implemented management decisions. Is then the
"actual "strategy the same as the "announced" strategy? Can the actual strategy
be monitored or compared to the actual strategy of HF belonging to the same "announced"
class? Can the announced or actual strategy be used as a quantitative argument
in the fund of funds policy? We present how methods akin to the study of complex
systems in Physics, Engineering, and Biology can be borrowed to enhance the
investor's ability to see what is behind the historical evolution of a net asset
value (NAV). With the appropriate metric, it is possible to draw a minimum
spanning tree (MST) to emphasize the similarity structure that could be hidden
in raw correlation matrix. We observe that some strategies effectively determine
clusters of homogeneous announced strategy funds, while others don't. We believe
this can be related to the degree of subjective discretionary decisions versus
objective model decisions implied by the type of strategy: the formers create
differences, while the others similarities.
Homogeneous clusters can be used as a reference for identifying anomalous funds.
Clusters may be used to define coherent benchmarks. In a portfolio
diversification process the most heavily connected node in a cluster can be used
as the most representative of his own class. In general, as a highly graphical
tool, fund trees in association with a solid due diligence, may facilitate the
incorporation of subjective judgment in the investment selection process.